Re: [RFC]hpt366/ide-probe reset drive on probe error.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

diff --git a/drivers/ide/hpt366.c b/drivers/ide/hpt366.c
index 3377766..ba4b802 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/hpt366.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/hpt366.c
@@ -1280,6 +1280,31 @@ static u8 hpt3xx_cable_detect(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
	return (scr1 & ata66) ? ATA_CBL_PATA40 : ATA_CBL_PATA80;
}

+/** routine to reset disk
+ *
+ * Since SUN Cobalt is attempting to do this operation, I should disclose
+ * this has been a long time ago Thu Jul 27 16:40:57 2000 was the patch date
+ * HOTSWAP ATA Infrastructure.
+ */
+
+static void hpt3xx_reset (ide_drive_t *drive)
+{
+	ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
+	struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(hwif->dev);
+	unsigned long high_16;
+	u8 reset;
+	u8 reg59h = 0;
+
+	printk(KERN_INFO "%s reset drive channel %d\n", __func__, hwif->channel);
+	high_16 = pci_resource_start(dev, 4);
+
+	reset = hwif->channel ? 0x80 : 0x40;
+
+	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x59, &reg59h);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x59, reg59h|reset);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x59, reg59h);
+}
+
static void __devinit init_hwif_hpt366(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
{
	struct hpt_info *info	= hpt3xx_get_info(hwif->dev);
@@ -1406,6 +1431,7 @@ static const struct ide_port_ops hpt3xx_port_ops = {
	.set_pio_mode		= hpt3xx_set_pio_mode,
	.set_dma_mode		= hpt3xx_set_mode,
	.quirkproc		= hpt3xx_quirkproc,
+	.resetproc		= hpt3xx_reset,
	.maskproc		= hpt3xx_maskproc,
	.mdma_filter		= hpt3xx_mdma_filter,
	.udma_filter		= hpt3xx_udma_filter,
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
index 7f264ed..09295b4 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
@@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ static int do_probe (ide_drive_t *drive, u8 cmd)
{
	ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
	const struct ide_tp_ops *tp_ops = hwif->tp_ops;
+	const struct ide_port_ops *port_ops = hwif->port_ops;
	u16 *id = drive->id;
	int rc;
	u8 present = !!(drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_PRESENT), stat;
@@ -427,9 +428,20 @@ static int do_probe (ide_drive_t *drive, u8 cmd)
		/* ensure drive IRQ is clear */
		stat = tp_ops->read_status(hwif);

-		if (rc == 1)
+		if (rc == 1) {
			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no response (status = 0x%02x)\n",
					drive->name, stat);
+
+			if (port_ops->resetproc) {
+				port_ops->resetproc(drive);
+				msleep(50);
+			}
+			tp_ops->dev_select(drive);
+			msleep(50);
+			tp_ops->exec_command(hwif, ATA_CMD_DEV_RESET);
+			(void)ide_busy_sleep(hwif, WAIT_WORSTCASE, 0);
+			rc = ide_dev_read_id(drive, cmd, id);
+		}
	} else {
		/* not present or maybe ATAPI */
		rc = 3;

Since the current code in ide-probe.c looks like this:

		stat = tp_ops->read_status(hwif);

		if (stat == (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRDY))
			return 4;

		if (rc == 1 && cmd == ATA_CMD_ID_ATAPI) {
			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no response (status = 0x%02x), "
					"resetting drive\n", drive->name, stat);
			msleep(50);
			tp_ops->dev_select(drive);
			msleep(50);
			tp_ops->exec_command(hwif, ATA_CMD_DEV_RESET);
			(void)ide_busy_sleep(hwif, WAIT_WORSTCASE, 0);
			rc = ide_dev_read_id(drive, cmd, id);
		}

		/* ensure drive IRQ is clear */
		stat = tp_ops->read_status(hwif);

		if (rc == 1)
			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no response (status = 0x%02x)\n",
					drive->name, stat);

I would really prefer fixing ATAPI case while we are at it
(+ this would also get rid of code duplication).

IOW:

- in patch #1 we would add ->resetproc call

- in patch #2 we would remove 'cmd == ATA_CMD_ID_ATAPI' check

[ looking a bit closer at the code in ide-probe.c ]

- in patch #2 we would move the ATAPI check to cover device selection/reset
 inside 'if ()' block

Sigh, this is even more complicated...

We should defer ->resetproc call until both drives are probed and do the
port reset after probing both drives given that:

We should just reset the port (and call resetproc() as a part of that). The resetproc() change should not be needed.

- we didn't detect any devices

and

- for one of devices do_probe() returned '1' (== "no response")

Also it would greatly help to clean/fix return values of do_probe()
and probe_for_drive() before doing the real changes.

   Sounds like the plan. :-)

Thanks,
Bart

MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux