And Robert Hancock writes: > Well, it's a potential concern, but it's simple enough I doubt it > would really result in much of a burden. My D620 is one of those that corrupted the file system with the force-AHCI patch. If I hadn't applied the patch externally, I might have guessed it was the file system code... Given all the churn in the fs code right now, is it wise to add another *known* corruption vector? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
