On Wednesday 22 April 2009 22:43:14 David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > applied > > By the way ... what about the first patch, > which removed accesses to all those non-existent > registers and bitfields? I didn't see any discussion on it and it looked less urgent / more risky (it is not uncommon for documentation to lack some data) than patch #2. Should it also go upstream for 2.6.30? Sergei? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html