Re: [PATCH 4/6] PalmLD IDE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Questions:

+ ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI

Is this a case of the controller cannot handle ATAPI in which case the
flag is correct, or you can't conceive of a user finding a way to add an
ATAPI device (but it would work as usually happens with basic PIO
hardware) in which case it isn't.

+	/* we'd better wait for drive's ready signal here
+	  (if we knew where it will come from) */
+	msleep(300);

Our probe code should already be waiting for ready signals  ?


The only other question is a general architectural one as to whether it
would be better to set up the GPIO etc and create a pata_platform
platform device (possibly tweaking pata_platform flags to allow the
caller to indicate generic pio with mode setting by set features command)

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux