Greg Freemyer wrote:
I'm not intimate with the details, but I would hope most boot loaders by now use LBA values to find the boot code, not CHS.
Yes, for "true" hard drives this is pretty much universal these days (except for MS-DOS and its ilk.) For USB and so on some BIOSes are still stuck in old times. Sigh.
If so the issue becomes the partitioning tools (fdisk etc.) putting the partitions at the right place. Can't those tools bypass the bios somehow and ask the drive itself what it's geometry is?
It can, but it MUST NOT do so. The fields that are to be entered into the partition table are BIOS CHS values, not any other kind of CHS.
From what I understand Vista has already made the jump and is now ignoring CHS and instead just putting the first partition at 1 MiB into the drive. (sector 2048 with 512 byte sectors.) Sounds like fdisk and friends should be updated to do the same.
Yes, that is way overdue.
A bigger issue in my mind is lots of clones, images, etc. are probably LBA based today and simply start the first partition at sector 63. Thus the hardware vendors will need to have drives that perform well with partitions that start at sector 63. The existing scheme described may be as good as it gets for that need. Also, how are SDD manufacturers handling this. Their erase blocks don't align with partitions that start at sector 63 either I assume?
Some SDD manufacturers (I don't know which ones) are actually examining the partition table and doing different things. I know this because they are permanently bricked if one writes an invalid partition table.
Not recommended. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
