Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
This is IDE host driver for AT91 (SAM9, CAP9, AT572D940HF) Static
Memory Controller with Compact Flash True IDE Mode logic.
Driver have to switch 8/16 bit bus width when accessing Task Tile or
Data
Register. Moreover some extra things need to be done when setting
PIO mode.
Only PIO mode is used, hardware have no DMA support. If interrupt
line is
connected through GPIO extra quirk is needed to cope with fake
interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@xxxxx>
This is prolly only me, but I afil to compile this driver with the
current arch/arm/configs/at91sam9263ek_defconfig:
CC drivers/ide/at91_ide.o
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c: In function ‘at91_ide_input_data’:
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c:159: error: implicit declaration of function
‘__ide_mm_insw’
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c: In function ‘at91_ide_output_data’:
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c:174: error: implicit declaration of function
‘__ide_mm_outsw’
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c: In function ‘at91_ide_tf_load’:
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c:192: error: ‘task’ undeclared (first use in
this function)
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c:192: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only
once
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c:192: error: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c: At top level:
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c:303: warning: initialization from incompatible
pointer type
drivers/ide/at91_ide.c:304: warning: initialization from incompatible
pointer type
make[1]: *** [drivers/ide/at91_ide.o] Error 1
make: *** [drivers/ide/] Error 2
Ah, it's only with pata-2.6 series applied. Bart, you clearly need
to include this driver to some of your patches...
I did and asked people to test the final result (see my mail on merging
at91_ide)... unfortunately it seems like I missed few spots... :)
Oops, got muddled in too many follow-ups. :-)
Namely, ide-remove-ide_task_t-typedef.patch is incomplete...
Was a bit more than that, I also needed to merge __ide_mm_* fixup below...
[ Anyway please verify that I got it right this time, thanks! ]
No, looks like you haven't again:
Applying patch ide-pass-command-instead-of-request-to-ide_pio_datablock.patch
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
missing header for unified diff at line 208 of patch
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
| printk(KERN_ERR "%s: multimode not set!\n",
| drive->name);
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
11 out of 11 hunks ignored
Patch ide-pass-command-instead-of-request-to-ide_pio_datablock.patch does not
apply (enforce with -f)
It appears that this patch has 2 hunks repeated twice now...
Strangely, the problem seems to be on your side this time as the patch
applies just fine here and AFAIK Stephen has successfully applied it to
linux-next (also md5sum of patch on kernel.org matches the local copy).
Did you forgot to re-sync the whole pata-2.6 tree by any chance?
This was a result of re-sync... something went awry when downloading the
patch indeed -- perhaps I didn't really overwrite it and appended instead. :-<
Thanks,
Bart
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
