Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: add support for CFA specified transfer modes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Add support for the CompactFlash specific PIO modes 5/6 and MWDMA modes 3/4.

Thanks for picking this up.

> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> This patch is against the current pata-2.6 series. Since there were no PIO5
> capable hard drives produced and you also need 66 MHz input clock to actually
> get the difference WRT the setup timing programmed, I decided to simply replace
> the old non-standard PIO mode 5 timings with CFA specified ones.
> Phew, hopefully I haven't overlooked anything -- quite a lot had to be changed.

It looks fine overall, few comments below.

> @@ -389,6 +389,8 @@ int ide_config_drive_speed(ide_drive_t *
>  	id[ATA_ID_UDMA_MODES]  &= ~0xFF00;
>  	id[ATA_ID_MWDMA_MODES] &= ~0x0F00;
>  	id[ATA_ID_SWDMA_MODES] &= ~0x0F00;
> +	if (ata_id_is_cfa(id))
> +		id[ATA_ID_CFA_MODES] &= ~0x0F30;

Shouldn't the mask be ~0x0FC0 here?

> @@ -90,6 +93,10 @@ u16 ide_pio_cycle_time(ide_drive_t *driv
>  		/* conservative "downgrade" for all pre-ATA2 drives */
>  		if (pio < 3 && cycle < t->cycle)
>  			cycle = 0; /* use standard timing */
> +
> +		/* IORDY must be ignored for CF specific PIO modes */
> +		if (pio > 4 && ata_id_is_cfa(id))
> +			cycle = 0; /* use standard timing */

This comment seems out of place for the code dealing with cycle timing.

When it comes to IORDY I recalled that some host drivers already support
"harddisk" PIO5 so they may need to be updated to not force IORDY setting
(seems like at least sl82c105.c is affected).

> @@ -79,7 +79,10 @@ u8 ide_get_best_pio_mode(ide_drive_t *dr
>  		}
>  
>  		if (id[ATA_ID_FIELD_VALID] & 2) {	      /* ATA2? */
> -			if (ata_id_has_iordy(id)) {
> +			if (ata_id_is_cfa(id) && (id[ATA_ID_CFA_MODES] & 7))
> +				pio_mode = 4 + min_t(int, 2,
> +						     id[ATA_ID_CFA_MODES] & 7);
> +			else if (ata_id_has_iordy(id)) {

Shouldn't this happen independently of id[ATA_ID_FIELD_VALID] & 2 value?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux