Backplane mystery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have an external enclosure with an SATA backplane with 20 drive slots. I am using 4 port multipliers to drive all 20 slots.

One set of 5 slots connected to a single port multiplier always fails with

[   16.449673] ata2: FORCE: PHY spd limit set to 1.5Gbps
[ 16.449740] ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0xfdeff000 port 0xfdefa000 irq 16
[   20.616038] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 10)
[ 80.596644] ata2: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0xe frozen
[   80.596956] ata2: irq_stat 0x00a00080, device exchanged
[   80.597039] ata2: hard resetting link
[   90.604024] ata2: softreset failed (timeout)
[   90.604108] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10)
[   90.604183] ata2: link online but device misclassified, retrying
[   90.604264] ata2: hard resetting link
[  100.604026] ata2: softreset failed (timeout)
[  100.604109] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10)
[  100.604186] ata2: link online but device misclassified, retrying
[  100.604259] ata2: hard resetting link
[  135.612026] ata2: softreset failed (timeout)
[  135.612109] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10)
[  135.612191] ata2: link online but device misclassified, retrying
[  135.612273] ata2: hard resetting link
[  140.616024] ata2: softreset failed (timeout)
[  140.616107] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10)
[ 140.616183] ata2: link online but device misclassified, device detection might fail
[  140.616296] ata2: EH complete

I've swapped cables, port multipliers, and so on. It's not the backplace, as I can swap cables from one of the port multipliers that works and it will detect drives. It's not the port multiplier, as I've swapped those. The only thing I can think of is that it's failing initialization. If I swap cables from a port multiplier that's initialized while the system is running, it works.

Before I start taking random actions, can someone interpret the above for me? What's it telling me?

For comparison, here's the initialization sequence from the adjacent port multiplier:

[   16.449504] ata1: FORCE: PHY spd limit set to 1.5Gbps
[ 16.449571] ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0xfdeff000 port 0xfdef8000 irq 16
[   18.536033] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 10)
[ 19.374191] ata10: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xbc00 ctl 0xb800 bmdma 0xb408 irq 21 [ 80.596647] ata1: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0xe frozen
[   80.596649] ata1: irq_stat 0x00a00080, device exchanged
[   80.596653] ata1: hard resetting link
[   82.796045] ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10)
[ 82.796408] ata1.15: Port Multiplier 1.1, 0x1095:0x3726 r23, 6 ports, feat 0x1/0x9
[   82.796796] ata1.00: hard resetting link
[   83.116406] ata1.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 10)
[   83.116482] ata1.01: hard resetting link
[   83.436402] ata1.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[   83.436479] ata1.02: hard resetting link
[   83.756394] ata1.02: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
[   83.756467] ata1.03: hard resetting link
[   84.076432] ata1.03: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[   84.076510] ata1.04: hard resetting link
[   84.396387] ata1.04: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[   84.396465] ata1.05: hard resetting link
[   84.716330] ata1.05: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
[   84.828010] ata1.02: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x11)
[   84.828082] ata1.15: hard resetting link
[   84.828145] ata1: controller in dubious state, performing PORT_RST
[   87.060032] ata1.15: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10)
[   87.060351] ata1.00: hard resetting link
[   87.380330] ata1.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 10)
[   87.380404] ata1.01: hard resetting link
[   87.700329] ata1.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[   88.756028] ata1.02: hard resetting link
[   89.076366] ata1.02: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
[   89.716017] ata1.05: hard resetting link
[   90.036392] ata1.05: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
[   90.148021] ata1.02: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x11)
[   90.148104] ata1.15: hard resetting link
[   90.148177] ata1: controller in dubious state, performing PORT_RST
[   92.380043] ata1.15: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 10)
[   92.380415] ata1.00: hard resetting link
[   92.700329] ata1.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 10)
[   92.700398] ata1.01: hard resetting link
[   93.020334] ata1.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[   94.076081] ata1.02: hard resetting link
[   94.396398] ata1.02: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
[   94.396479] ata1.03: hard resetting link
[   94.716392] ata1.03: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[   94.716465] ata1.04: hard resetting link
[   95.036397] ata1.04: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[   95.036474] ata1.05: hard resetting link
[   95.356426] ata1.05: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
[ 95.369116] ata1.02: ATA-8: Hitachi HDT721010SLA360, ST6OA31B, max UDMA/133
[   95.369193] ata1.02: 1953525168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
[   95.370256] ata1.02: configured for UDMA/100
[   95.370769] ata1: EH complete

If I swap cables from ata1 to ata2 while the system is running, the backplane will detect drives and work fine.

I'm already forcing a slower speed:

yan@selene:/etc/modprobe.d$ cat libata
options libata force=1.15:1.5Gbps,2.15:1.5Gbps,3.15:1.5Gbps,4.15:1.5Gbps

I'm using a Sil 3132 controller:

02:00.0 Mass storage controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)

The system sees 3 port multipliers; not 4 as it should:

[ 82.488354] ata4.15: Port Multiplier 1.1, 0x1095:0x3726 r23, 6 ports, feat 0x1/0x9 [ 82.488507] ata3.15: Port Multiplier 1.1, 0x1095:0x3726 r23, 6 ports, feat 0x1/0x9 [ 82.796408] ata1.15: Port Multiplier 1.1, 0x1095:0x3726 r23, 6 ports, feat 0x1/0x9

I suspect it's cabling length as the 5 "dead" slots are the farthest down the backplane but swapping cables randomly just doesn't seem like a good approach.

What's my next step?

Thanks,

--Yan

--
 o__
 ,>/'_          o__
 (_)\(_)        ,>/'_        o__
Yan Seiner      (_)\(_)       ,>/'_     o__
      Personal Trainer      (_)\(_)    ,>/'_        o__
            Professional Engineer     (_)\(_)       ,>/'_
Who says engineers have to be pencil necked geeks?  (_)\(_)

I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux