Re: libata timeouts when stressing a Samsung HDD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Lord wrote:
>>ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
>>ata1.00: cmd ea/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0
>>         res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
>>ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
> 
>>>> I wonder if it's just a case of too short a timeout on the cache
>>>> flushes?
> ..
>> However, in this case the drive is not reporting Busy status at the
>> timeout, which suggests maybe an interrupt got lost or something.
>> (Could be still the drive's fault.)
> ..
> 
> If I recall correctly, The reported shadow register contents are bogus
> when a timeout occurs.  So we don't actually know what the drive state was.
> 
> Or do we, Tejun?

Yeah, it's bogus.  Maybe we should just report zeros.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux