Re: libata timeouts when stressing a Samsung HDD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
If I use an ext3 filesystem with noatime I never see problems, but if I use XFS
with barriers and atime enabled, I keep getting this:

ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
ata1.00: cmd ea/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0
         res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
ata1: hard resetting link
ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 13851948

ext3 doesn't use barrier by default.  Timing out on FLUSH_CACHE is a
pretty good sign that something is wrong with the disk.  Can you
please post the output of "smartctl -a /dev/sda"?
..

I missed the start of this thread,
but want to point out that something similar was observed here
with a pair of Hitachi 750GB drives (RAID0) and XFS and FLUSH_CACHE.

If I let hddtemp or smartctl run periodically during heavy writes,
one (or both?) of the drives would eventually have issues and require
a reset.  Problem was never resolved (I simply got rid of the periodic
hddtemp and smartctl invocations instead).

-ml


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux