Thursday 12 February 2009 10:33:56 Stanislaw Gruszka napisał(a): > > Shouldn't this rather be done in the at91_ide driver? > > I don't want to duplicate it in all the different at91sam9XX_devices.c files. > > Ok, I'll move detection stuff to the driver. Not sure about reset, see my > previous mail on this issue. Could we move the reset into driver and > risk system boot with device which possibly generate interrupts? > Or perhaps we can remove reset as whole? I'll finally move resetting stuff into board specific file and detect code into driver. > > You could also define two separate "CF type" devices - one for CS4, > > another for CS5. > > That would allow for two independent "CF type" interfaces to be used > > at the same time (see at91sam9260_devices.c in maxim.org.za patches). > > I saw sam9260 code before and I refused idea of doing two CF devices > interfaces. AFAIK there are no boards we two CF slots (or separate one > IDE and one CF slot), are they? I don't think someone really need such > board (I could be wrong). If there become a board with two interfaces, > then new patch can be done which extend the code. I see no discussion here is possible :) , ok I'll revrite the code in form like at91sam9260_devices.c has. Cheers Stanislaw Gruszka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
