Re: libata timeouts when stressing a Samsung HDD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
I wonder if it's just a case of too short a timeout on the cache flushes?

The answer in general to this question has always been "yes".....

Unless this has changed in the past year, the worst case for SATA cache flush can definitely exceed 30 seconds... it is unbounded as defined in the spec, and unbounded in practice as well.
..

But I don't think we've yet seen a proven case of it taking too long
for the current libata timeouts.  Unless it's happening now.
T'would be good to find out..  Chuck?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux