Re: SSD data reliable vs. unreliable [Was: Re: Data Recovery from SSDs - Impact of trim?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/01/2009 05:16, Neil Brown wrote:
[...]
Probably the only practical data structure for this would be a bitmap
similar to the current write-intent bitmap.

Is it really worth supporting this in raid5?   Are the sorts of
devices that will benefit from 'discard' requests likely to be used
inside an md/raid5 array I wonder....

Assuming I've understood correctly, this usage map sounds to me like a useful thing to have for all RAIDs. When building the array in the first place, the initial sync is just writing a usage map saying it's all empty. Filesystem writes and discards update it appropriately. Then when we get failing sectors reported via e.g. SMART or a scrub operation we know whether they're on used or unused areas so whether it's worth attempting recovery.

Cheers,

John.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux