> I'm sorry, that was totally off base. I've misread this whole paragraph in > haste. :-< > The rest of my evening was wasted, sigh. If it got the CF code fixed it wasn't a waste. Do I understand rightly that the agreed things to do are - redo the version check patch using the signed check as you suggested and remove the changes to the CFA check from it - make the CFA code check word 80 == 0 as a sanity check - apply your change to check the bit in the right command word for CFA ? Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
