Thursday 22 January 2009 13:24:18 Sergei Shtylyov napisał(a): > Hello, I wrote: > > >>>>> + t9 = t2i - t1; > >>>>> > >>>> It more sense to calculate such things *after* quantizing the > >>>> timings with calc_mck_cycles()... > >>>> > >>> Why? > >>> > >> > >> More precise result -- matching the clock being used. > > > > However, I don't understand now why you need to stretch t9... > > Ah, I do again. t0 *should be equal* to t1 + t2 + t9 for the better > speeds. And hold time should meet min t2i requirement, so t9 = max(t9_orig, t2i - t1). Stanislaw Gruszka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
