Hello, I wrote:
+ t9 = t2i - t1;
It more sense to calculate such things *after* quantizing the
timings with calc_mck_cycles()...
Why?
More precise result -- matching the clock being used.
However, I don't understand now why you need to stretch t9...
Ah, I do again. t0 *should be equal* to t1 + t2 + t9 for the better
speeds.
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
