Re: sata_mv: trial fix for lost NCQ interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sounds great! Sorry, but I can't check the patch in the near future, I don't have necessary hardware at the moment :(

Mark Lord пишет:
Harri Olin wrote:
..
After first 55 minutes of testing, no timeouts yet, so I'm quite sure it works ok now (yay!). Without this patch, timeouts happened every couple minutes on similar load. I think I'll let it run for a day and report back tomorrow how things are by then.
..

Okay, we have a winner!
I just need to get the "okay" from Marvell,
and then I'll feed this patch for 2.6.29 and earlier -stable streams.

Note that I didn't apply the previous patch as they don't apply on each other. If needed, I can test it separately after running this for a while.
..

No need. The earlier patch has no effect, other than speeding up your system by a slight amount. I'll submit that for upstream separately, along with a
fix for another "duh!" I noticed in the code.

In the meanwhile, you should keep the working patch (obviously)
in your kernels -- the same/similar patch will apply to earlier
kernels if needed.

Thanks to you and Brian for the legwork!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux