Re: [PATCH 0/7] ide: locking improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
The work has already been done and it is a wortwhile work.  The risk is
quite low (this is the statement based on rather deep understanding of
IDE subsystem, the complete audit of all code-paths affected and all the
testing experiences from Scalex86/me).

Moreover the patch won't be merged after few months of extra testing.

I feel that you still keep on questioning the point of improving IDE
and insist on putting it into "bug-fixes only" mode.  If this is really
the case I'm completely uninterested in discussing it any further.

What, exactly, is the point of making more than bug-fix-only changes to the IDE code today, when we have libata around which is a much better code base to work from? I'm afraid it still escapes me. I don't mean to denigrate the work that you and other people working on IDE are doing, but can't help but think there would be more productive outlets for it..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux