On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:56:37PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Saturday 11 October 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > On Saturday 11 October 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 11 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > [... ] > > Don't you just love it when all gets resolved peacefully and > everything is fine and dandy afterwards. I'm so happy we've > straightened that one out. Just a final quick note which by no means > is targetting to resparkle the discussion: I have another bug report, > hm, well :), but still, the machine is a 8-core AMD Dell box (with the > option of upgrading to 16 cores) which _is_ using ide-cd so, there are > some people using that code, after all :). I'm sure those people will > be happier when it scales to that many cores. > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11498. Not to throw a monkey wrench, but I did add 'pushing data' to that IDE statement. There is of course lots of systems still with a parallel channel for things like atapi drives. But that is completely parallel to the initial argument, those don't care a rats ass about scalability. They care about it working, that is all. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
