Alan Cox wrote: >> see it as libata-core won't call them if unsupported but qc_issue will >> see it. Can you please unnak? > > No. Please see the patch I posted. It got a bit stuck as I got no reply > at all to the original query so it was filed on the low priority pile. > Simply quick fixing one case isn't the way to sort a bug like that. > > No un-nak as I've now been through and fixed the lot including a couple > of really nasty assumptions that >= UDMA_0 means UDMA mode (which isnt > true as 0xFF is no DMA) Ah... okay. That looks like a much better way to handle this. Let's continue there. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
