On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:51:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > IDE interrupt handler relies on the fact that, if necessary, hardirqs > > will re-trigger on ISR exit. With fully preemtable IRQs this seems to > > be not true, since if hardirq thread is currently running, and the > > same IRQ raised again, then this IRQ will be simply lost. > > actually no, that should not happen - if -rt loses an IRQ then something > broke in the threaded IRQ code. It's supposed to be a drop-in, > compatible IRQ flow with no driver changes needed. ..just as I thought, the bug somewhere deeper... heh. > ( also, please do not Cc: mainline maintainers to RFC -rt patches, let > the -rt maintainers sort out the need for any patch propagation - once > the patches are sufficiently cooked. Thanks. ) Ok, thanks. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
