* Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IDE interrupt handler relies on the fact that, if necessary, hardirqs > will re-trigger on ISR exit. With fully preemtable IRQs this seems to > be not true, since if hardirq thread is currently running, and the > same IRQ raised again, then this IRQ will be simply lost. actually no, that should not happen - if -rt loses an IRQ then something broke in the threaded IRQ code. It's supposed to be a drop-in, compatible IRQ flow with no driver changes needed. ( also, please do not Cc: mainline maintainers to RFC -rt patches, let the -rt maintainers sort out the need for any patch propagation - once the patches are sufficiently cooked. Thanks. ) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
