Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/2] libata: implement ATAPI_HORKAGE_NOPIO and apply it to GGW-H10N

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
>> Originally the drive was bought for a different PC with a Silicon Image
>> 3114 controller. The drive worked fine with this (sata_sil). Then I
> 
> Ok that proves the point quite nicely. If there is a problem it is not
> the one suggested.

Yeah, indeed.  It's still weird tho.  The difference between
ATAPI_PROT_PIO and ATAPI_PROT_DMA is very small especially on ahci.  The
data are still transferred using the same FIS.  Only the completion
mechanism is different.  It would be great to try the drive on another
ahci controller preferably intel one.  Luke, do you have access to any
machine which has intel ahci?

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux