On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:52:49 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > > I think I mentioned on the list a couple weeks ago that I favor just > > expanding the definition of link power management to include > > the notion of simply powering the entire port off rather > > than adding new knobs to sysfs. I wrote this completely untested and > > very incomplete patch to give you a better idea of what I am proposing. > > This patch adds a new valid value of "power_off" for the existing > > link_power_management_policy sysfs entry: > > Looks fine to me... that would work nicely. > > I think your patch is missing code to handle the transition from > power_off to <something else>, though, right? > > I'm quite happy with this approach. > > Jeff > > > yeah - it's missing a lot. I'll flesh it out some more and send a real one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
