Re: [RFC] expand link_power_management_policy definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
I think I mentioned on the list a couple weeks ago that I favor just expanding the definition of link power management to include
the notion of simply powering the entire port off rather
than adding new knobs to sysfs.  I wrote this completely untested and
very incomplete patch to give you a better idea of what I am proposing.
This patch adds a new valid value of "power_off" for the existing
link_power_management_policy sysfs entry:

Looks fine to me...  that would work nicely.

I think your patch is missing code to handle the transition from power_off to <something else>, though, right?

I'm quite happy with this approach.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux