Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:15:27 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
Here you can see that it would be very easy for another driver
to just add code to set the NO_HOTPLUG flag and then this code
will work for them as well, since we power off the phy using
DET which is specified by SATA.
here's that code:
Agreed. The main discussion in this sub-thread is more about user
interface. The user interface in this case, a module option, is
specific to AHCI.
Surely you can see how it is a bit silly to force each driver writer to
create the same user interface in each driver, to support a generic concept.
Jeff
Not all drivers will need a user interface to turn off hotplug
I would think. At any rate - I would think it'd be better to let
driver writers decide how they want their drivers to behave wrt
hotplug and power instead of forcing a generic policy on everyone.
This patch would provide users of AHCI controllers a way to save
power now, while you work on the grand scheme for polling/turning on off
hotplug via sysfs. It's an interim solution that impacts nobody but
ahci users and is can be easily integrated into whatever solution you
eventually work out.
I like the patch - it seems that it will help a lot of users out near
term in a very positive way while we iterate on the broader solution,
ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html