Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
As far as I know the patch has gone nowhere. I believe that
Jeff wanted something more flexible than the module parameter that
I provided to override the BIOS options. I am not working on this,
I figured he had a pretty firm idea what he wanted so he was better
equipped to write the patch.
Thanks Kristen,
Can you say which laptops you had tested this on where it saved power?
(Did you test any Thinkpads, in particular?) I'm wondering if it's
worth trying to forward port your patch as a private mod to my kernel;
30 to 40 minutes of extra battery life is nothing to sneeze at!
- Ted
I tested this on an Intel mobile software development platform
with a newer mobile ICH - the power savings were measured at the actual
component (via probes on the ICH), so I did not measure the power
savings at the wall socket, although I would expect the power savings
to be even greater on the other side of the power supply. So in short,
yes, I think it's worth it to give it a try - the patch is pretty
unintrusive, so it should be that difficult a port to do.
Can you repost the patch? I believe we should push it and only add
complex enable/disable functionality if someone needs it...
If you are talking about SATA -- incorrect.
The patch deals with policy, and the user MUST have the ability to
control this stuff. Otherwise you create a situation where the user
might be denied hotplug use in valid cases, or similar negative situations.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
