On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 21:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2008 20:37:40 -0700 Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 May 2008 22:26:18 -0400 Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I'm flexible...although I'd probably get nailed to a cross for changing > > it again so soon. (the unaligned versions, that is) > > We'll live. > > (I'm not a big fan of the patches, btw. It's more of an "oh groan, > because it's there I suppose we really ought to do this" sort of thing. > (strong objections would save me a lot of work (looks hopefully at > inbox))). Well in the case of the le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)ptr), it can be profitable to use the le16_to_cpup..or get_le16 directly as some arches have optimized versions of the pointer versions. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
