Re: libata sata_via unusual behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So, let me clarify a bit:

i did the same test in 3 different configuration:
"cat bigfile >/dev/null"

3 configuration were

1) Machine A (the slow one) from the big partition (1000gb) - got 5mb/s
2) Machine A from the small partition - got 16mb(s
3) Machine B from 300gb partition - got 28mb/s

Machine A: AthlonXP 800 -Via KT600 - SATA disk western digital -
direct ext3 filesystems (no raid-no lvm-no nothing)

Machine B: Pentium 2 350 - i440bx - seagate IDE drive - direct ext3 filesystems

I also did another test: putting a cpu intensive process  in the
background with nice -n 20. The test showed the process was not being
executed almost at all, so those %wa cpu cycles are somehow cpu cycles
since they dont let other processes execute. (in fact when i do stuff
with the disk my system became incredibly slow)

Finally  i tried the test you suggested me
root@rivendell:~# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/testfile bs=1024000 count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1024000000 bytes (1,0 GB) copied, 16,9609 s, 60,4 MB/s

real    0m17.119s
user    0m0.010s
sys     0m12.890s

with a sample cpu usage of:
Cpu(s):  0.7%us, 15.0%sy,  0.0%ni, 76.1%id,  6.6%wa,  0.0%hi,  1.7%si,  0.0%st


root@rivendell:~# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/local/testfile bs=1024000 count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1024000000 bytes (1,0 GB) copied, 23,3957 s, 43,8 MB/s

real    0m23.898s
user    0m0.010s
sys     0m14.090s

with a sample cpu usage of
Cpu(s):  1.3%us, 50.7%sy,  0.0%ni,  0.0%id, 45.4%wa,  0.7%hi,  2.0%si,  0.0%st


( / was the 30gb partition, /local the 900gb)




On 5/18/08, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> real    5m16.352s
>> user    0m0.132s
>> sys     0m6.244s
>
> So the CPU usage is ok
>
>> root@ubuntu:/media/disk/movies# ls -la Lo\ squalo.avi
>> -rw-r----- 1 1000 1001 1559521280 2008-03-30 06:37 Lo squalo.avi
>>
>> it means roughly those old 5mb/sec.
>> In the meanwhile i checked with top, and all the cpu cycles were taken
>> by the disk (about 98.0%wa and 0.0%id)
>
> 98.0%wa - wait time, not CPU time.
>
> Its still a very slow copy rate unless the disks are on the same IDE
> channel. How is the disk set up - ext3 direct or via raid/lvm ?
>
> Also is a copy of the movie to /dev/null slow or fast, ditto a copy
> from /dev/zero to disk of that sort of size ?
>
> Alan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux