Re: ata_std_qc_defer not good enough for FIS-based switching ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Lord wrote:
Mmm.. I just plugged the same PM + drives into my sata_sil24 card here,
and that driver went bonkers when I did the same test.

Had to reboot eventually to recover.

Hmm... That can't be. Above all, although we do manual scheduling around sil24, the controller does its own scheduling and will happily issue command in the right order even if the software scheduler screws up. Do you have the log?

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux