On Sunday 27 April 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > I do actually not care much how this gets resolved (we could even > > > ditch HAVE_IDE and provide asm/ide.h on all architectures) if there's > > > general agreement that this is the way to go. > > > > Seems like a way to go now that all crazy IDE core code vs arch code > > inter-dependiences have been fixed (the ideal solution would be to ditch > > asm/ide.h completely but this requires some more time/work). > > I invented HAVE_IDE in the past to make it trivial for arm to > use drivers/Kconfig. > And that incentive are not broken by your suggestion so fine with me. Cool. > But I really do not know about s390. They were the only one > without IDE in the past. They don't seem to support neither PCI nor ISA so I think that we should just special case them (== make IDE depend on BLOCK && !S390). Thanks, Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
