Re: [2.6 patch] xtensa: don't offer ATA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adrian Bunk wrote:
Trying to build libata for xtensa fails with the following error:

<--  snip  -->

...
  CC [M]  drivers/ata/libata-core.o
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c: In function 'ata_devchk':
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c:1034: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite8'
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c:1043: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioread8'
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c: In function 'ata_data_xfer':
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5027: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioread16_rep'
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5029: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite16_rep'
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5037: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioread16'
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5041: error: implicit declaration of function 'iowrite16'
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c: In function 'ata_wait_register':
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/ata/libata-core.c:7700: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioread32'
make[3]: *** [drivers/ata/libata-core.o] Error 1

<--  snip  -->

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
aa579e7ab065e41a9d1e27e1f4b7af6b0508018c diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
index 25aba69..f34e9d1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ menuconfig ATA
 	tristate "Serial ATA (prod) and Parallel ATA (experimental) drivers"
 	depends on HAS_IOMEM
 	depends on BLOCK
-	depends on !(M32R || M68K) || BROKEN
+	depends on !(M32R || M68K || XTENSA) || BROKEN
 	depends on !SUN4 || BROKEN
 	select SCSI

XTENSA offers HAS_IOMEM but not iomem functions? That seems like the problem to me.

Overall, we should not be adding specific arches to an exclusion list, we should defining HAS_IOFOO or MISSING_IOFOO or another symbol in the appropriate arch.

	Jeff




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux