On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:48:36PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59:16AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:37:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Any objections against the patch below? > > > > Let's look at the rest of the situation surrounding HAVE_IDE first. > > It's something of a mess: > > > > avr32, m68knommu, ppc, s390 and v850 do not have asm/ide.h > > > > avr32, m68knommu, ppc, v850 all set HAVE_IDE, arch/s390/Kconfig contains > > no reference. > > > > avr32 supports PATA (which is IDE). > > > > Everything else provides an asm/ide.h and sets HAVE_IDE. > > > > So: > > > > Q1. Do avr32, m68knommu, ppc, v850 have IDE support or do they not? > > avr32 is fixed in 2.6.25 (no more HAVE_IDE) avr32 has ATA, so the only reason it doesn't actually use IDE is because they're using libata entirely. This is NO different from the situation on ARM - some machine classes use entirely libata, others use IDE, and some others are trying to give up IDE in favour of libata. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
