Jeff Garzik wrote:
Now raise hands those who knew that your ATA controller is SFF
compliant.
/me raises a hand.
Is there any technical reason why we have to bother users with the
ATA_SFF option at all?
It sounds like a perfect canndidate for being select'ed.
'default y' is appropriate, but option that is used to disable a major
swath of legacy code unneeded on modern FIS-based SATA platforms like AHCI.
Heh.. yeah, but I have to admit SFF support is cryptic. We can
definitely use some friendly explanation there.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
