On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:23:53 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:06:56 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> > >>>> Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>>> Hi Jeff, > >>>>> > >>>>> For a while the linux-next build for avr32 defconfig (and others) has > >>>>> been failing like this: > >>>>> > >>>>> drivers/ata/libata-core.c:127: error: 'ata_pci_default_filter' > >>>>> undeclared here (not in a function) > >>>>> > >>>>> It seems to be because the declaration of ata_pci_default_filter is > >>>>> protected by CONFIG_PCI but the usage above is protected by CONFIG_ATA > >>>>> only. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also reported by Randy Dunlap (on March 26) and Haavard Skinnemoen (on > >>>>> March 29). > >>>> fixed being pushed right now (patch from Tejun fixed it) > >>> > >>> Some fixes other than what was in today's (April 04) > >>> [git patches] libata fixes? > >>> > >>> I hope there is more. I don't see how that fixes this error. > >>> Nor does gcc see how, after I apply that patch. > >> > >> It wasn't sent in #upstream-fixes, it was applied to #upstream... > >> > >> Is that where you are looking? > > > > I'm just trying to build linux-next with or without today's "libata fixes". > > ATA with CONFIG_PCI=n still has build errors, as reported above. > > OK, that's expected. Uh, that's not good. What does it mean? (a) linux-next is not pulling the correct branch of your git tree or (b) linux-next just won't work with libata or (c) we have too many trees in the forest or something else? (if so, what?) --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
