Re: [PATCH #upstrema-fixes] libata: fix IDENTIFY order in ata_bus_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>

Commit f58229f8060055b08b34008ea08f31de1e2f003c accidentally made
ata_bus_probe() not use reverse order probing.  Fix it.

There currently isn't any PATA driver which uses obsolete
ata_bus_probe() path, so this patch is mainly for correctness.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c |    2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 4851988..2db5c9c 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -2660,7 +2660,7 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
       specific sequence bass-ackwards so that PDIAG- is released by
       the slave device */

-    ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) {
+    ata_link_for_each_dev_reverse(dev, &ap->link) {
        if (tries[dev->devno])
            dev->class = classes[dev->devno];


applied


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux