Re: sata_sil24 stability and performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>> Also, few months ago instead of sata_sil24 I had my drives connected to
>>> sata_mv (Supermicro 8-port) and performance was normal...
>> Everything seems okay.  I wonder where the difference is.  Does "dd
>> if=/dev/zero of=file oflags=direct bs=1M" make any difference?  And can
>> you vacate a raw partition and try it on there?
> 
> oflag=direct has no effect - same speed. Tried it on a raw /dev/sda device
> and still no difference. It maybe slighly better, giving me 18 MB/s.
> 
> Can it be something with the way SiI 3124 controller is configured in the
> system?

Hmmm... That's strange you did specify the "bs" parameter, right?  It
should essentially give the same performance as "hdparm -t".  I wonder
where the difference comes from.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux