Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> - I think bugs caused by using raw_data_len instead of data_len are more
>> subtle than the other way around.  Using data_len instead of
>> raw_data_len usually affects the application layer while using
>> raw_data_len instead of data_len affects the DMA engine and transport layer.
> 
> If we add extra_len, we can get what raw_data_len and data_len
> provide.
> 
> I can't see what changing the meaning of rq->data_len (and
> investigating all the block drivers) gives us.

No matter which way you go, you change the meaning of rq->data_len and
you MUST inspect rq->data_len usage whichever way you go.  Apply your
patch and try to do sg IO on IDE cdrom w/ various transfer lengths.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux