Re: [PATCH 03/24] ide-tape: remove pipeline-specific code from idetape_add_chrdev_read_request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 01 March 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> We fall back to non-pipelined operation through idetape_queue_rw_tail with cmd
> set to REQ_IDETAPE_READ. Also, remove idetape_switch_buffers() since it becomes
> unused.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ide/ide-tape.c |   46 +---------------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> index abf3efa..e919d41 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> @@ -1776,16 +1776,6 @@ static void idetape_init_merge_stage(idetape_tape_t *tape)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void idetape_switch_buffers(idetape_tape_t *tape, idetape_stage_t *stage)
> -{
> -	struct idetape_bh *tmp;
> -
> -	tmp = stage->bh;
> -	stage->bh = tape->merge_stage->bh;
> -	tape->merge_stage->bh = tmp;
> -	idetape_init_merge_stage(tape);
> -}
> -
>  /* Add a new stage at the end of the pipeline. */
>  static void idetape_add_stage_tail(ide_drive_t *drive, idetape_stage_t *stage)
>  {
> @@ -2403,9 +2393,6 @@ static int idetape_init_read(ide_drive_t *drive, int max_stages)
>  static int idetape_add_chrdev_read_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int blocks)
>  {
>  	idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data;
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	struct request *rq_ptr;
> -	int bytes_read;
>  
>  	debug_log(DBG_PROCS, "Enter %s, %d blocks\n", __func__, blocks);
>  
> @@ -2413,39 +2400,8 @@ static int idetape_add_chrdev_read_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int blocks)
>  	if (test_bit(IDETAPE_FLAG_FILEMARK, &tape->flags))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/* Wait for the next block to reach the head of the pipeline. */
> -	idetape_init_read(drive, tape->max_stages);

Can it be simply removed?  Why?

> -	if (tape->first_stage == NULL) {
> -		if (test_bit(IDETAPE_FLAG_PIPELINE_ERR, &tape->flags))
> -			return 0;
> -		return idetape_queue_rw_tail(drive, REQ_IDETAPE_READ, blocks,
> +	return idetape_queue_rw_tail(drive, REQ_IDETAPE_READ, blocks,
>  					tape->merge_stage->bh);

Looking at the driver code tape->first_stage is not always NULL,
seems like ide_tape_add_stage_tail() should vanish first?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux