Andrew Morton wrote: >> So, I guess it's NACK w/o suggested alternatives, right? > > I wouldn't nack without good reasons, and I have none here. I don't have > very strong opinions either way. I was just wondering whether I should just go with snprintf dancing in eh_link_report, which does make sense if not many need merging printk. > As a seat-of-the-pants thing, it does seem to be a lot of core code to > solve a fairly minor problem in (afaik) one remote place. But I haven't > looked - perhaps there are other places which could be improved if such > facilities were available. Okay, I see. I'll look around and see whether there are other places which can use it. I can think of a few in SCSI. Let's see. Thanks. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
