Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:40:51 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Can you please take a look at ata_eh_link_report() in
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c?

I did.  Punishment?

>  Currently, it has some problems.

Yes, and the patches do clean that up.

ho hum.  What tends to happen with this sort of thing is that fi we merge
it, it ends up getting used more often than one expected...


If you stand back and squint at it, there are quite a few places where we
do this sort of thing: allocate a buffer, squirt characters into it,
reallocating and/or flushing as we proceed.  All sysfs and procfs read-side
code, for a start...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux