Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
Create host-owned DMA memory pools, for use in allocating/freeing
per-port
command/response queues and SG tables. This gives us a way to
guarantee we
meet the hardware address alignment requirements, and also reduces
memory that
might otherwise be wasted on alignment gaps.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@xxxxxxxxx>
ACK patches 1-13
applied patches 1-9 to #upstream. patch #10 failed, with git-am
reporting it as a corrupt patch.
..
That's weird. I can save the email from linux-ide here,
and apply as a patch (after 01-09) with no issues at all.
Jeff got mail reader problems?
Here it is again, in case it got corrupted in transit to you.
Nope, not corrupted in transit or on this side. It falls into a
familiar pattern:
* git-am(1) fails
* patch(1) succeeds
* when applying patch, patch(1) drops a .orig turd
So while patch(1) succeeds because patch(1) is highly forgiving and
git-am(1) is more strict, something was definitely strange on that
incoming email. patch(1) lets you know by giving you a .orig file,
something not normally created if the patch operation was 100% sound.
ISTR Linus or Junio explaining why git-am(1) was more strict and why it
was a good thing... As I did in this case, I usually just run patch(1),
look carefully at the result using 'git diff HEAD', and then
commit/resolve the changes.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
