Re: [PATCH 1/5] libata: prefer hardreset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> -	/* prereset() might have modified ehc->i.action */
>> -	if (ehc->i.action & ATA_EH_HARDRESET)
>> -		reset = hardreset;
>> -	else if (ehc->i.action & ATA_EH_SOFTRESET)
>> -		reset = softreset;
>> -	else {
> 
> Seems we'll need this chunk.  Will post updated version.

Eeeeek... Never mind.  I was confused.  Sorry about the noise.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux