On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:41:08PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:00 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > And mprintk the following. > > > > code: > > DEFINE_MPRINTK(mp, 2 * 80); > > > > mprintk_set_header(&mp, KERN_INFO "ata%u.%2u: ", 1, 0); > > mprintk_push(&mp, "ATA %d", 7); > > mprintk_push(&mp, ", %u sectors\n", 1024); > > mprintk(&mp, "everything seems dandy\n"); > > I prefer Matthew Wilcox's stringbuf approach which does proper memory > management and isn't specific to printk: > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.3/0517.html Do you have any strong feelings whether we should merge my stringbufs or rusty's version? I have no particular preference. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
