Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata: implement libata.force_cbl parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
>>> In which case we only need to be able to force UDMA33 or less ?
>> Cable detection goes wrong and 40c is detected as 80c.  However, we got
> 
> In which case we only (see first question). I don't see why we need to
> force anything but "max speed UDMA 33"

Ah.. yeah, right.  I somehow missed the negation in the question.
There's no need to force 80c usually.  The parameter might be as well
force_40c and only force 40c limit.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux