Re: [patch 3/9] libata: xfer_mask is unsigned int not unsigned long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:30:33 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>

xfer_mask is unsigned int not unsigned long.  Change ->mode_filter to
take and return unsigned int.

While at it, rename @adev of ata_pci_default_filter() to @dev for
consistency.

[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: fix types]
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 drivers/ata/libata-sff.c       |    5 +++--
 drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c        |    2 +-
 drivers/ata/pata_ali.c         |    2 +-
 drivers/ata/pata_amd.c         |   10 +++++-----
 drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c      |    2 +-
 drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c      |    4 ++--
 drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c    |    4 ++--
 drivers/ata/pata_scc.c         |    2 +-
 drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c |    4 ++--
 include/linux/libata.h         |    9 +++++----
 10 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
patch is outdated...


What does this mean??


following discussion, was superceded by

commit 52fc241b4c5ef60d73327d9468634694a1f7d359
Author: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Nov 27 19:43:42 2007 +0900

    libata: xfer_mask is unsigned long not unsigned int

which has been in netdev#upstream for a few weeks, and probably at least one -mm release.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux