Re: [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:03:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * Find a page of the appropriate migrate type.  Doing a
> +		 * reverse-order search here helps us to hand out pages in
> +		 * ascending physical-address order.
> +		 */
> +		list_for_each_entry_reverse(page, &pcp->list, lru)

It's not obvious why ascending physical order is a good thing.  How
about:

+		/*
+		 * Find a page of the appropriate migrate type.  Doing a
+		 * reverse-order search here helps us to hand out pages in
+		 * ascending physical-address order, which improves our
+		 * chances of coalescing scatter-gather pages.
+		 */

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux