Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Based on the previous work by Tejun Heo.
There should be no functionality changes caused by this patch.
I didn't get the point. Why do you consider them "empty"?
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
@@ -620,8 +620,10 @@ static int set_multcount(ide_drive_t *dr
if (drive->special.b.set_multmode)
return -EBUSY;
+
ide_init_drive_cmd (&rq);
- rq.cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_ATA_CMD;
+ rq.cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_ATA_TASKFILE;
+
drive->mult_req = arg;
drive->special.b.set_multmode = 1;
(void) ide_do_drive_cmd (drive, &rq, ide_wait);
Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ int ide_cmd_ioctl (ide_drive_t *drive, u
struct request rq;
ide_init_drive_cmd(&rq);
- rq.cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_ATA_CMD;
+ rq.cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_ATA_TASKFILE;
return ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, &rq, ide_wait);
}
Index: b/drivers/ide/ide.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide.c
@@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ int set_pio_mode(ide_drive_t *drive, int
return -EBUSY;
ide_init_drive_cmd(&rq);
- rq.cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_ATA_CMD;
+ rq.cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_ATA_TASKFILE;
drive->tune_req = (u8) arg;
drive->special.b.set_tune = 1;
MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
