Re: [PATCH 01/14] libata: update atapi_eh_request_sense() such that lbam/lbah contains buffer size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> While updating lbam/h for ATAPI commands, atapi_eh_request_sense() was
>> left out.  Update it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/ata/libata-eh.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
>> index 77083b5..2e3d3a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
>> @@ -1302,8 +1302,8 @@ static unsigned int
>> atapi_eh_request_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
>>          tf.feature |= ATAPI_PKT_DMA;
>>      } else {
>>          tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI;
>> -        tf.lbam = (8 * 1024) & 0xff;
>> -        tf.lbah = (8 * 1024) >> 8;
>> +        tf.lbam = SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE;
>> +        tf.lbah = 0;
> 
> seems like #upstream-fixes material?

I'm not too sure yet whether we'll need to revert ATAPI transfer chunk
size change for #upstream-fixes or not.  It fixes some cases while
breaking others.  Dunno which side is larger but we definitely don't
wanna regress in a released kernel.  I thought adding full chunk
draining would fix regressions but apparently not.  Fortunately, with
full ATAPI data transfer improvement patch applied, it works.  I'll
investigate more.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux