On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:57:55PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:58:10AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 05:54:49PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > while (1) {
> > send_patches();
> >
> > if (ack_collected(PaulM) && ack_collected(PowerPC_people))
> > break;
> >
> > sleep(wait_for_comments_timeout); <-- currently here.
>
> I still haven't seen you address the compatible comments (that
> pata-platform is suboptimal). Or did I miss some respin of the patches?
I didn't resend these patches yet. You started the thread, but you hid
away from the discussion (you had been Cc'ed to every mail).
1. Arnd suggested {p,s}ata-pio-{1,2,3,..} or ata-{1,2,3,..} compatible
scheme;
2. Sergei verbosely explained that that there is no reason to
complicate compatible property. He suggested ata-generic, or
ata-simple;
Mainly I was awaiting for your further comments. By now I tend to
follow Sergei's comments and rename compatible stuff to ata-generic.
Are you fine with it?
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@xxxxxxx
backup email: ya-cbou@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
